DrPop's Last Stand

[Mumps]

trigggl, I'd recommend PrimaBoinca for the CPU's. There's an AMD bias there, and, as of today, SG is outcrunching us there, so we won't have that #1 Team spot for long unless we get back on it.

Besides, it's good credits too!

[trigggl]

trigggl, I'd recommend PrimaBoinca for the CPU's. There's an AMD bias there, and, as of today, SG is outcrunching us there, so we won't have that #1 Team spot for long unless we get back on it.

Besides, it's good credits too!

Well, he did email me back, so I have my marching orders.

For those keeping score at home, they are KIM and BOK (currently). Trying to get them ready to go tonight. Decided I wanted boincmgr installed. That's 46 more packages to install. I'm at about 36.

[GregK]

nice thanks for the update!

[Beerdrinker]

Well, he did email me back, so I have my marching orders.

For those keeping score at home, they are KIM and BOK (currently). Trying to get them ready to go tonight. Decided I wanted boincmgr installed. That's 46 more packages to install. I'm at about 36.

Awesome! Man I am glad that DrPop is on "our" side...He be smoking now!

[trigggl]

Houston, we have a problem!

I can't get this router to play nice with Gentoo.



Anyone know anything about TRENDnet routers?

[Bok]

It's not resolving anything at all?

What does

cat /etc/resolv.conf

and

ifconfig -a

say ?

what about traceroute 8.8.8.8

I tend to use google's nameservers these days (8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4)

The machine shouldn't care about any router upstream at all really.

[trigggl]

It's not resolving anything at all?

What does

cat /etc/resolv.conf

and

ifconfig -a

say ?

what about traceroute 8.8.8.8

I tend to use google's nameservers these days (8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4)

The machine shouldn't care about any router upstream at all really.

KIM ~ # cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 192.168.x.1

KIM ~ # ifconfig -a
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:11:d8:a2:2f:49  
          inet addr:192.168.x.94  Bcast:192.168.x.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::211:d8ff:fea2:2f49/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:3168545 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:3053345 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:3188606987 (2.9 GiB)  TX bytes:2846526234 (2.6 GiB)
          Interrupt:16 

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:536087 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:536087 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:5449516037 (5.0 GiB)  TX bytes:5449516037 (5.0 GiB)

tunl0     Link encap:IPIP Tunnel  HWaddr   
          NOARP  MTU:1480  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)

KIM ~ # traceroute 8.8.8.8
-su: traceroute: command not found

KIM ~ # ping 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=1 ttl=50 time=130 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=2 ttl=50 time=139 ms
^C
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 130.903/135.092/139.282/4.205 ms

I guess I don't have traceroute installed yet. Don't know if that makes a difference. I assume not.

This is what's bizarre to me. I can ping an address, but not use a service.

KIM ~ # ping www.google.com
PING www.l.google.com (74.125.224.180) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 74.125.224.180: icmp_req=1 ttl=53 time=12.6 ms
64 bytes from 74.125.224.180: icmp_req=2 ttl=53 time=11.1 ms
^C64 bytes from 74.125.224.180: icmp_req=3 ttl=53 time=11.1 ms

--- www.l.google.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 11.182/11.685/12.684/0.706 ms

KIM ~ # ssh trigggl.is-an-engineer.com
ssh: Could not resolve hostname trigggl.is-an-engineer.com: Name or service not known

Just to be clear, I do manage to use the service without the name.

KIM ~ # ssh 68.51.6.65
Password:
Last login: Sat Apr 23 10:12:55 CDT 2011 from adsl-69-230-183-166.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net on ssh

╔╦═╡root@stephie╞═╡10:12 AM╞═╡~╞═╗
╠╬╗ exit
logout
Connection to 68.51.6.65 closed.

[Bok]

just change /etc/resolv.conf to be

nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 8.8.4.4

and not use the local router at all. They are very reliable.

[trigggl]

just change /etc/resolv.conf to be

nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 8.8.4.4

and not use the local router at all. They are very reliable.

Google put that there for the public to use? I guess I would have to assume they did or they would be better protected. That was nice of them.

Well, well, well...

KIM ~ # ssh trigggl.is-an-engineer.com
The authenticity of host '[trigggl.is-an-engineer.com] ([68.51.6.65]:)' can't be established.
ECDSA key fingerprint is x
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes
Warning: Permanently added '[trigggl.is-an-engineer.com]:' (ECDSA) to the list of known hosts.
Password: 
Last login: Sat Apr 23 10:12:55 CDT 2011 from adsl-69-230-183-166.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net on pts/4

╔╦═╡root@stephie╞═╡10:31 AM╞═╡~

Thanks, DrBok! I do believe this puts these things back in business.

116: 23-Apr-2011 08:37:35 (low) [http://www.primegrid.com/] update requested by user
117: 23-Apr-2011 08:37:39 (low) [http://www.primegrid.com/] Fetching scheduler list
118: 23-Apr-2011 08:37:41 (low) [http://www.primegrid.com/] Master file download succeeded

Now I just need to figure out why cuda isn't working yet.

[Bok]

Cool.

And yes, they are public google nameservers. No need to use your own.

Most routers just proxy to their ISP anyway so you aren't doing too many more hops.