Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 69

Thread: Moo!: DNETC replacement

  1. #31
    Silver Member
    Crazybob's Son's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 12th, 2010
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Posts
    537

    Re: Moo!: DNETC replacement

    Darn, we were 1st for a little while here, but looks like we got passed by Sic - stats

  2. #32
    Silver Member
    Dandasarge's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 3rd, 2010
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    586

    Re: Moo!: DNETC replacement

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazybob's Son View Post
    Darn, we were 1st for a little while here, but looks like we got passed by Sic - stats
    I think this is a good project, Thanks to Zomb and Max for getting us on this ASAP we seem to do good at getting in the door first And out into the team. But I feel that any more on this project should be in the "Project Strategy" form.
    People do not grow old no matter how long we live. We never cease to stand like curious children before the great Mystery into which we


  3. #33
    Platinum Member
    Crazybob's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25th, 2010
    Location
    Preparing for the flakes!
    Posts
    2,529

    Re: Moo!: DNETC replacement

    As soon as you create a profile over there, you become UOTD!

    Joined Original Message Board: Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:47 pm, Currently with 11298 Posts

    If it ain't crunch'n, unplug it!

  4. #34
    Administrator
    Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 27th, 2010
    Location
    CO summer, TX winter
    Posts
    6,457

    Re: Moo!: DNETC replacement

    If anyone has a single 5850 or 5870 rig you might try the project. Steve has a pair of 5850s and calculating his run rate from credits it appears that computer will produce 1M per day. Not bad for 2 x 5850.

    Steve can not get dual 5870s to run and neither can I. I also can not get 5970s work as they should. BUT I think single cards are doing okay and paying big credits.


  5. #35
    Platinum Member
    Maxwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25th, 2010
    Location
    Everett, WA
    Posts
    3,300

    Re: Moo!: DNETC replacement

    I tried the CUDA app on my 570 @850/1700:

    WU1: Completed and validated 2,494.26 2,445.11 8,659.79 Distributed.net Client v1.00 (cuda31)
    WU2: Completed and validated 2,694.34 2,667.38 725.93 Distributed.net Client v1.00 (cuda31)

    Less time, and 12x the credits. This is weird...

  6. #36
    Diamond Member
    zombie67's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 24th, 2010
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    7,294

    Re: Moo!: DNETC replacement

    I don't think you can credit comparisons to other projects, until they get this straightened out.

    Even for single GPUs, errors are common.

    Payment for tasks seem to run in one of 3 categories: ~400, ~4000, ~5-10000. That last group just started showing up today.
    "Don't confront me with my failures, I had not forgotten them" - Jackson Browne

    Avatar source


  7. #37
    Past Administrator
    Fire$torm's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2010
    Location
    In the Big City
    Posts
    7,938

    Re: Moo!: DNETC replacement

    FYI: I have 3x 4850s running with no issues that I can see.

    Task -- Work unit - Computer --------- Status --------- Run time --- CPU time --- Credit
    16566 --- 14111 --- 297 --- Completed and validated --- 1,141.51 --- 506.08 --- 8,884.41

    Edit: LOL. Right after I posted this the temps on two cards dropped. Now only one card has 97% utilization the other two are at 0%
    Last edited by Fire$torm; 05-03-11 at 06:54 PM.


    Future Maker? Teensy 3.6

  8. #38
    Diamond Member
    zombie67's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 24th, 2010
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    7,294

    Re: Moo!: DNETC replacement

    Quote Originally Posted by Fire$torm View Post
    FYI: I have 3x 4850s running with no issues that I can see.

    Task -- Work unit - Computer --------- Status --------- Run time --- CPU time --- Credit
    16566 --- 14111 --- 297 --- Completed and validated --- 1,141.51 --- 506.08 --- 8,884.41

    Edit: LOL. Right after I posted this the temps on two cards dropped. Now only one card has 97% utilization the other two are at 0%
    Sure...that one task. Look at the full list:

    http://moowrap.net/results.php?hosti...state=3&appid=

    Only tasks two paid normally. The rest paid only 300-700. And run times are all over the place.
    "Don't confront me with my failures, I had not forgotten them" - Jackson Browne

    Avatar source


  9. #39
    Gold Member
    joker's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25th, 2010
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    1,600

    Re: Moo!: DNETC replacement

    First WU done in 58 minutes and reported just fine. Now we will see if it validates. Keeping fingers crossed.

  10. #40
    Past Administrator
    Fire$torm's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2010
    Location
    In the Big City
    Posts
    7,938

    Re: Moo!: DNETC replacement

    Quote Originally Posted by zombie67 View Post
    Sure...that one task. Look at the full list:

    http://moowrap.net/results.php?hosti...state=3&appid=

    Only tasks two paid normally. The rest paid only 300-700. And run times are all over the place.
    OK, then the utilization issue I edited in seems to help explain the run times. It might also be a factor in how credits are awarded.

    Edit: My original post, I was talking about hardware, as in the cards not crashing. The task I listed was just to show that my system was working, nothing more.
    Last edited by Fire$torm; 05-03-11 at 07:09 PM.


    Future Maker? Teensy 3.6

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •