Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Any info on what exactly is "wrong" @ SETI?

  1. #1
    Past Administrator
    DrPop's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2010
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    7,635

    Any info on what exactly is "wrong" @ SETI?

    I've been doing some thinking... (I can hear the "uh-ohs" and groans already! )...
    The reason I don't crunch much SETI anymore is simply a poor credits thing. However, I know a lot has been said in the past regarding "issues" within the scientific portion of the project, and how they will ne er find anything at all because the project's data or what have you is flawed from the beginning.

    Now, considering the phenomenal number of computers hooked up to project SETI@Home, the countless hours of computer time and electricity going down the tubes for this. . . Not to mention it is (or rather, it should be) the cornerstone project and shinning example of what Distributed computing power can do for humanity...

    Does anyone else see the insanity of it all? If there is error in either the scientific method applied to the data, problems with storing it or algorithm errors or whatever the case may be; is there some way the project can be salvaged from a scientific standpoint?

    I will come out and say I think it a bit arrogant of the human race to think we are alone or even "higher on the food chain" than anything else out there in the universe. It's a great idea to continue the search or at least stay open to it, so that's why I'm curious for details on what exactly is wrong with the project, and if it can be salvaged.

    Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2

  2. #2
    Past Administrator
    Fire$torm's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2010
    Location
    In the Big City
    Posts
    7,938

    Re: Any info on what exactly is "wrong" @ SETI?

    I recall someone mentioning that S@H now has access to "clean" data. So if the project is actually using this newer source then the work done is valid.


    Future Maker? Teensy 3.6

  3. #3
    Diamond Member
    zombie67's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 24th, 2010
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    7,269

    Re: Any info on what exactly is "wrong" @ SETI?

    The question is: Has anyone started even looking at the results yet? Last time I checked (a few years ago), no one had EVER looked at the results to see if there was anything significant to follow up on.
    "Don't confront me with my failures, I had not forgotten them" - Jackson Browne

    Avatar source


  4. #4
    Platinum Member
    Mumps's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 28th, 2010
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    3,994

    Re: Any info on what exactly is "wrong" @ SETI?

    Quote Originally Posted by zombie67 View Post
    The question is: Has anyone started even looking at the results yet? Last time I checked (a few years ago), no one had EVER looked at the results to see if there was anything significant to follow up on.
    Actually, it was a couple years ago they started posting "Hits" that eventually led them to realize their Aricebo data was being corrupted by the nearby Radar installation in the first place. They thought they knew the timing of it, but learned otherwise. And the frequency that the radar bursts are seen in the data stream, that they then have to "blank out" to avoid false positives, leads to a very spotty data set to work through. Have you ever made sense of someone talking on the phone when you were missing every other word? Well, try imaging that when the person talking isn't even speaking your language!

    With their newer data source, I've got hope they may eventually be able to make something of the data, but I agree, I gave up expecting it to produce any real results and moved on. Let's cure Cancer or produce better medicines and materials instead.

  5. #5
    Past Administrator
    DrPop's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2010
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    7,635

    Re: Any info on what exactly is "wrong" @ SETI?

    Thanks guys, glad to hear there is hope for this project to one day find something worth while.

    @Mumps- is there any word on what their new source is, or how much cleaner it is than Arecibo was? (I think that's what they were using initially, wasn't it?)...
    Last edited by DrPop; 06-15-12 at 03:25 AM.

  6. #6
    Gold Member
    c303a's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25th, 2010
    Location
    East Troy, Wi
    Posts
    1,412

    Re: Any info on what exactly is "wrong" @ SETI?

    I gave up working SETI when they changed to Boinc and have not bothered to go back to it except for a small burst of work units. I have turned to the scientific areas to try to help out in my humble way some of the projects that we here on earth really should care about. Not saying that we are alone or anything like that, but trying to find someone or something 1,000,000 light years away seems like a lot of wasted computing time to me when we don't even have a cure for the common cold.

    This is only my take on SETI and why I don't do any wu's anymore. I, of course, am not telling others not to crunch it. Crunch whatever you want and keep coming up with good discussions on the board.

    RETIRED. NO JOB. NO MONEY. NO WORRIES!

    Crunched SETI Classic to the end.


    SETI@home classic workunits
    17,550
    SETI@home classic CPU time 86,861 hours




  7. #7
    Gold Member
    Slicker's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25th, 2010
    Location
    South of Cheeseland
    Posts
    1,253

    Re: Any info on what exactly is "wrong" @ SETI?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mumps View Post
    Have you ever made sense of someone talking on the phone when you were missing every other word? Well, try imaging that when the person talking isn't even speaking your language!
    ...or even on the phone because he is just an imaginary friend.
    Spring 2008 Race: (1st Place)

  8. #8
    Gold Member
    Slicker's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25th, 2010
    Location
    South of Cheeseland
    Posts
    1,253

    Re: Any info on what exactly is "wrong" @ SETI?

    Men can't even understand women much less apes, dolphins, or less intelligent species. So, what makes anyone think that they'd be able to understand an alien? Or, if the alien is so advanced that they can transmit a signal across the galaxy, does anyone really think they would do it via radio waves? Really? That makes about as much sense as the gold plated record that went up with Voyager. Of course the aliens would have a record player! OK, it was actually a laser disc with images, video, music, and data on it, but do you know anyone who has one? And someone thinks the aliens would have one?
    Spring 2008 Race: (1st Place)

  9. #9
    Past Administrator
    Fire$torm's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2010
    Location
    In the Big City
    Posts
    7,938

    Re: Any info on what exactly is "wrong" @ SETI?

    Quote Originally Posted by Slicker View Post
    ...Of course the aliens would have a record player! OK, it was actually a laser disc with images, video, music, and data on it, but do you know anyone who has one?
    ET had one!


    Future Maker? Teensy 3.6

  10. #10
    Past Admin
    Mike029's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 24th, 2010
    Location
    Bronx, New York
    Posts
    3,377

    Re: Any info on what exactly is "wrong" @ SETI?

    Quote Originally Posted by Slicker View Post
    Men can't even understand women much less apes, dolphins, or less intelligent species. So, what makes anyone think that they'd be able to understand an alien? Or, if the alien is so advanced that they can transmit a signal across the galaxy, does anyone really think they would do it via radio waves? Really? That makes about as much sense as the gold plated record that went up with Voyager. Of course the aliens would have a record player! OK, it was actually a laser disc with images, video, music, and data on it, but do you know anyone who has one? And someone thinks the aliens would have one?
    Come on!! These were our best and brightest minds working on that project. Spent a Billion dollars to put that product up there.

    To Quote Bruce Willis in Armageddon, " I mean, you-you're NASA for cryin' out loud, you put a man on the moon, you're geniuses! You-you're the guys that think this shit up! I'm sure you got a team of men sitting around somewhere right now just thinking shit up and somebody backing them up! You're telling me you don't have a backup plan,..."




Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •