Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Linux question

  1. #1
    Ambassador from TSBT scole of TSBT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 8th, 2015
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    1,009

    Linux question

    How much performance/credit difference is there between running Linux under VBox vs. booting Linux from a USB stick?

  2. #2
    Administrator
    Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 27th, 2010
    Location
    CO summer, TX winter
    Posts
    6,457

    Re: Linux question

    It seems to be machine/processor dependent. On my I7-3930s I get about a 12% boost. On the Dell T5500s (dual Xeon 5675s) I see 25% and that makes a huge difference. Sphynx also has some T5500s and he saw the same level of improvement. So there is no one answer that covers it.

    There is very little difference between running native Linux on the HDD and running it on a USB stick.


  3. #3
    Administrator
    Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 27th, 2010
    Location
    CO summer, TX winter
    Posts
    6,457

    Re: Linux question

    After thinking about it a little more the answer might be what I see on the I7 rigs ... 12.6%. Mumps and I were talking a while back and he said he had noticed on one of his dual AMD processor machines that native Linux did MUCH better than VBox. So that probably indicates that VBox doesn't handle dual processor as well as it could.


  4. #4
    Gold Member
    trigggl's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 6th, 2010
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,077

    Re: Linux question

    It probably depends on if you're using USB-3. With USB-2, anything that writes to memory a lot will slow things down. I seem to recall that being my experience with running linux off of a USB stick (since I don't have USB-3).
    6r39 7r199



  5. #5
    Ambassador from TSBT scole of TSBT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 8th, 2015
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    1,009

    Re: Linux question

    If a system only has USB 2.0 ports, is there any performance advantage using a USB 3.0 stick? I understand the USB bus only runs a 2.0 speed, but do the newer USB 3.0 sticks operate faster internally? Or is the USB 2.0 bus speed going to be the bottleneck?

    Or have you guys worked out a way to control duel boot on a headless system and choose which OS to default load? Which makes booting from a USB drive unnecessary, doesn't it?
    Last edited by scole of TSBT; 08-18-15 at 04:19 PM.

  6. #6
    Administrator
    Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 27th, 2010
    Location
    CO summer, TX winter
    Posts
    6,457

    Re: Linux question

    I've run 3 of my machines off of USB 2.0 sticks in 2.0 slots (dual Xeons rigs that don't support 3.0) and there is very little difference in performance to running off the internal HDD. You might get a small boost off of using 3.0 sticks but if 2.0 is close to HDD capability then it won't be much.

    All the articles I found on running remote dual boot used methods I'm not willing to screw with remotely where I have no access to the machines for months. When I head south in another 5 weeks I will have the machines with programmable power strips and powered USB hubs. If I want to switch to Linux I will turn on the USB hub (with Linux stick) using the programmable power strip and then reboot the machine. If I want to run Windows I will turn off the hub and reboot and the machine will go into its default Windows OS.

    If someone has a better way of doing it, I certainly be interested in hearing about it also


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •