PDA

View Full Version : Would you participate in a distributed sensor array? [poll inside]



-horn-
01-07-14, 08:38 PM
We humbly ask for your opinion if you would take part in a distributed sensor array and help science, if you have to buy the needed hardware for it.

After watching the video "Monitoring the Spectrum: Building Your Own Distributed RF Scanner Array" by Andrew Reiter [30c3], I really liked his idea and contacted him. I asked him if he thinks he could use Constellation for it and he was very positive about it. So now we both would like to know if YOU are also interested in it in particular and in sensor arrays in general. This will give us a small overview what we have to keep in mind during possible preparations.

http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/r5BTUVPeoVY/mqdefault.jpg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5BTUVPeoVY)

Sensor arrays with BOINC are nothing new. For example there is Quake Catcher Network where you can be part by plugging small accelerometers to your PC and help detect nearby earth quake tremors. So in case we would ask you to help in a similar science objectives, what do you do? To give you an idea, watch the bottom linked video! :)

Click here for the online poll! (http://opst.co/1a412hc)

Thank your for taking your time and vote. And please tell your friends and share the vote! :)

Andreas and Andrew

Mumps
01-11-14, 01:44 PM
I did watch the video (yes, the whole hour of it :) ) and I'd be interested in more information on how your project would utilize them. Andrew talks about huge amounts of data and putting together antenna arrays individually. Would the BOINC participants need to put up for more than the USB Dongle and maybe a single antenna? That I'd consider do-able, but not building this vast array like Andrew is talking about for a single location. :)

(And I'm not on any of the Social Media sites required to log in to vote, so I can't vote on the poll. :rolleyes:)

-horn-
01-11-14, 11:10 PM
Hi Mumps,


... That I'd consider do-able, but not building this vast array like Andrew is talking about for a single location. :)
(And I'm not on any of the Social Media sites required to log in to vote, so I can't vote on the poll. :rolleyes:)

firstly, use the "anonymous" option on the bottom, then you don't need one of those social media access :).

And yes, I am fully backing your point! It's doable, but with a scaled down approach. That is what I proposed to Andrew. He can still do the thing he presented there and have us BOINC users doing a small part of this, but perhaps with one or two dongles. Small data droplets are still data :). I also just found out about his project when watching the 30c3 stream and asked him if he could need help and infrastructure with Constellation. Overcrowded RF is an important space issue to be solved, and mapping it is the first step. And I like the idea to buy a simple 10 dollar usb dongle and that's basically it! :).
And now I am here and ask you what you think about and if you would help! :) So thanks for the reply so far! :)

Andreas

circeseye
01-12-14, 02:12 AM
you can vote anonymously its on the bottom. also i wouldnt mind this but yea building a huge set of arrays is well a lot. kind of curious if satellite dishes could be used to gather signals

-horn-
01-12-14, 08:18 AM
moien,


also i wouldnt mind this but yea building a huge set of arrays is well a lot. kind of curious if satellite dishes could be used to gather signals

yeah, but brick by brick it adds to the full building :). When I watched his talk I liked his idea, but I thought by msyself, that I would only place one or maximum two of those antennas in my garden. So with this smaller concept I think Constellation would be nice to have there to bring access to such an array to more people like me.

And yes, receiving satellites is our/my ultimate goal ;) And there is also a video for that http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RJSLFP7yyA ;)

So thanks for voting! Only 2 left for 100!!! :)

Andreas

circeseye
01-12-14, 04:56 PM
moien,



yeah, but brick by brick it adds to the full building :). When I watched his talk I liked his idea, but I thought by msyself, that I would only place one or maximum two of those antennas in my garden. So with this smaller concept I think Constellation would be nice to have there to bring access to such an array to more people like me.

And yes, receiving satellites is our/my ultimate goal ;) And there is also a video for that http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RJSLFP7yyA ;)

So thanks for voting! Only 2 left for 100!!! :)

Andreas

you misunderstood me. not using satellites (good idea thou). but to use satellite dishes to pull in signals.(like taking a direct tv dish and modifying it) instead of antennas

-horn-
01-13-14, 08:15 PM
you misunderstood me. not using satellites (good idea thou). but to use satellite dishes to pull in signals.(like taking a direct tv dish and modifying it) instead of antennas

Hi,

we also don't want to use satellites for communication, just receiving their signals and track them :).
And antenna dishes are also just antennas, so for me there is no difference. in fact satellite dishes use small horn antennas and the reflector. So they could be used. We want to avoid them, because you must steer them with motors, which costs money! or you only have some 10° of effective opening angles not covering a huge segment of the sky, what we want.
But yes, it could be used.

Andreas

PS: 112 votes so far, thanks! :)

Fire$torm
01-16-14, 10:20 PM
Okay, now at 131 votes. Just got around to adding mine.

circeseye
01-16-14, 10:46 PM
Hi,

we also don't want to use satellites for communication, just receiving their signals and track them :).
And antenna dishes are also just antennas, so for me there is no difference. in fact satellite dishes use small horn antennas and the reflector. So they could be used. We want to avoid them, because you must steer them with motors, which costs money! or you only have some 10° of effective opening angles not covering a huge segment of the sky, what we want.
But yes, it could be used.

Andreas

PS: 112 votes so far, thanks! :)

actually if we were able to modify a dt tv dish the motors are easily home made. at least in my case. :) i know how to set up an easy motor where it can constantly swing back and forth in 45^ 180^ or just spin in circles with even up and down variances. and also i have access to tons of them damn dishes cause i remodel homes and they tell me to take them off and throw them away lol so i can have one heck of a set up :P

Mumps
01-16-14, 11:12 PM
So, just take 36 of them arranged in an outward facing circle. Bam! Full 360 degree coverage! :))

circeseye
01-17-14, 01:06 AM
So, just take 36 of them arranged in an outward facing circle. Bam! Full 360 degree coverage! :))

dont tempt me :p

-horn-
01-24-14, 06:31 AM
actually if we were able to modify a dt tv dish the motors are easily home made. at least in my case. :)...

hi, yes, that would be awesome because it's cheap! :D
I am considering it for DGSN, but for a later point, because we want to avoid motors. But the 360° phalanx would be even more cool! :D
Hehe. So that is why I like open source. You can add things to another project as you wish :).

And THANK you for all your votes! We have 158 right now! And it's still increasing! Keep on voting here http://www.opinionstage.com/polls/2182765


Andreas