Slicker
05-16-14, 10:46 AM
I'm considering the purchase of a DL360e Gen8 for use as a Microsoft SQL Server database server. I can either go with HP's Mainstream Endurance Large Form Factor (e.g. 3.5") SSD or I can go with SAS or SATA drives. The database is relatively small (under 10GB) and the server will have anywhere from 16 to 32GB RAM so if should be able to cache a lot of the data. Either way, there would be 4 drives for a RAID 5 w/ spare configuration. That or since the SSDs would be fast enough, I could go with RAID 1 (mirror) with two drives and have two host spares. We tend to run our servers for 3-4 years in the production environment before buying new ones and migrating the older ones to the test or development environment where they run another 3-4 years.
When in use (September thru May, 10 hours per day on weekdays for the most part) the server averages 60KB/second with peaks to about 8MB/second once in a while.
What are your thoughts on using SSDs for database servers? Would it pay to have RAID 5 w/ one hot spare instead of RAID 1 with two hot spares just to split the I/Os across more SSD drives? The SSDs would probably be 200GB each and < 50GB is needed for the OS, apps, and database so there would be space available for the SSD to mark areas as not longer usable after too many writes. Or, should I save more money and just go with the SAS drives?
Thoughts? Opinions?
When in use (September thru May, 10 hours per day on weekdays for the most part) the server averages 60KB/second with peaks to about 8MB/second once in a while.
What are your thoughts on using SSDs for database servers? Would it pay to have RAID 5 w/ one hot spare instead of RAID 1 with two hot spares just to split the I/Os across more SSD drives? The SSDs would probably be 200GB each and < 50GB is needed for the OS, apps, and database so there would be space available for the SSD to mark areas as not longer usable after too many writes. Or, should I save more money and just go with the SAS drives?
Thoughts? Opinions?