Assimilator1
06-19-14, 03:19 PM
So please share your new scores for old & new GPUs & CPUs alike!
Please note requirements for the benchmark :-
Validated 106.88 credit WUs only & must be from the MilkyWay@Home v1.0x app (the separation mod fit ones are slower, ~20s on my HD 5850 @850 MHz).
Average of 5 WU times (not cherry picked please! ;) ).
A dedicated CPU core for each GPU.
Please state clock speeds if overclocked (including factory overclocks) or state 'stock'.
Please only crunch 1 WU at a time per GPU, otherwise it will massively increase WU time! (even if it does increase output, the WU times seem to fluctuate much more than singly crunched WUs so you can't 1/2 the time either).
For CPUs you'll want to crunch 1 WU per real core.
It would also be handy if you could state your BOINC & driver version & OS, incase it does make any odds.
I'm hoping the large team SETI.USA has in MW will bag a load of times :).
************************************************** **********************************
Current GPU statistics ~ Average Run Time to Complete 1 MW v1.02 106.88 credit WU :-
R9 280X (GPU 1185 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 23s ...... DutchDK (http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36401845&postcount=7)
R9 280X (GPU 1125 MHz, RAM 975 MHz) ................ 23.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61834)
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 950 MHz) ................ 24.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61821)
HD 7950 (GPU 1188 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 24.1s ... GLeeM (http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36399181&postcount=3)
R9 280X (GPU 1070 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 25s ...... WES (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61811)
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 28.1s ... GLeeM (http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36399181&postcount=3)
HD 7950 (GPU 900 MHz) ...................................... 33s ...... Tom* (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61806)
HD 7950 (stock) .................................................. 39.8s ... Rudy Toody (http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36398723&postcount=2)
HD 5970 (GPU 900 MHz, RAM 1200 MHz) ............... 43.7s ... superpower (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61816)
HD 5850 (GPU 850 MHz, RAM u/c 500 MHz) ............ 51s ..... Assimilator1
HD 5970 (GPU 735 MHz, RAM 1010) ...................... 52.6s ... superpower (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61807) (dual GPU card)
HD 5850 (stock) .................................................. 60s ..... Assimilator1
GTX 690 (stock) ................................................. 394s .... S@NL - JBG (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61798) (dual GPU card)
Current CPU statistics ~ Average CPU Time to Complete 1 MW v1.0x 106.88 credit WU :-
Intel Xeon X5570 (Turboing to 3.2 GHz) ............... 3376s ... DutchDK (http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36401845&postcount=7)
Intel i7-4702MQ @2.2GHz, (HT on) ...................... 6245s ... Maxwell (http://www.setiusa.us/showthread.php?7160-Milkyway-Benchmark-thread-GPU-amp-CPU-times-wanted-old-amp-new-hardware!&p=90595&viewfull=1#post90595)
************************************************** **********************************
If you've seen my previous benchmark threads at other forums & your wondering why I'm starting over again it's because the original (long) version of the 213.76 credit WU used for that benchmark has become only sporadically available now. At 1st a short version joined it & so for a while we had both (which confused some people) & then the long 1 disappeared altogether for a time! It is sporadically back now but it just makes things too difficult.
Also I later found out that some people don't run the mod fit WUs (like the 213.76s) because of lower credit & some people can't run them due to hardware limitations (e.g HD 3800s). I did ask at the MW forum originally but no one said anything :p.
So this time I've chosen MW@H v1.02 106.88 credit WU for the benchmark, although it's shorter run times give the illusion of smaller performance gaps between different hardware it'll be easier overall.
Further info.
Current benchmarking thread (http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2384985) at AT
For reference, link to my 1st MW benchmark thread at AnandTech. (http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2366988)
New thread at the Milky Way forums (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551) & the KWSN thread (http://www.kwsnforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=205134#205134)
Stock clocks for the above o/ced graphic cards (GPU/RAM MHz):-
HD 5850 ...................... 725/1000
HD 5970 ...................... 725/1000 (dual GPU)
HD 7950 ...................... 800/1250
HD 7950 Boost ............. 850-925/1250
R9 280X ...................... 850-1000/1500
************************************************** ********
Thank god this uses similiar forum s/w as AT, it seems all links & formatting held :)
Btw still trying to gather enough times to add my old CPU to the list, but not getting enough CPU WUs!
Please note requirements for the benchmark :-
Validated 106.88 credit WUs only & must be from the MilkyWay@Home v1.0x app (the separation mod fit ones are slower, ~20s on my HD 5850 @850 MHz).
Average of 5 WU times (not cherry picked please! ;) ).
A dedicated CPU core for each GPU.
Please state clock speeds if overclocked (including factory overclocks) or state 'stock'.
Please only crunch 1 WU at a time per GPU, otherwise it will massively increase WU time! (even if it does increase output, the WU times seem to fluctuate much more than singly crunched WUs so you can't 1/2 the time either).
For CPUs you'll want to crunch 1 WU per real core.
It would also be handy if you could state your BOINC & driver version & OS, incase it does make any odds.
I'm hoping the large team SETI.USA has in MW will bag a load of times :).
************************************************** **********************************
Current GPU statistics ~ Average Run Time to Complete 1 MW v1.02 106.88 credit WU :-
R9 280X (GPU 1185 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 23s ...... DutchDK (http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36401845&postcount=7)
R9 280X (GPU 1125 MHz, RAM 975 MHz) ................ 23.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61834)
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 950 MHz) ................ 24.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61821)
HD 7950 (GPU 1188 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 24.1s ... GLeeM (http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36399181&postcount=3)
R9 280X (GPU 1070 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 25s ...... WES (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61811)
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 28.1s ... GLeeM (http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36399181&postcount=3)
HD 7950 (GPU 900 MHz) ...................................... 33s ...... Tom* (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61806)
HD 7950 (stock) .................................................. 39.8s ... Rudy Toody (http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36398723&postcount=2)
HD 5970 (GPU 900 MHz, RAM 1200 MHz) ............... 43.7s ... superpower (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61816)
HD 5850 (GPU 850 MHz, RAM u/c 500 MHz) ............ 51s ..... Assimilator1
HD 5970 (GPU 735 MHz, RAM 1010) ...................... 52.6s ... superpower (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61807) (dual GPU card)
HD 5850 (stock) .................................................. 60s ..... Assimilator1
GTX 690 (stock) ................................................. 394s .... S@NL - JBG (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551&postid=61798) (dual GPU card)
Current CPU statistics ~ Average CPU Time to Complete 1 MW v1.0x 106.88 credit WU :-
Intel Xeon X5570 (Turboing to 3.2 GHz) ............... 3376s ... DutchDK (http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36401845&postcount=7)
Intel i7-4702MQ @2.2GHz, (HT on) ...................... 6245s ... Maxwell (http://www.setiusa.us/showthread.php?7160-Milkyway-Benchmark-thread-GPU-amp-CPU-times-wanted-old-amp-new-hardware!&p=90595&viewfull=1#post90595)
************************************************** **********************************
If you've seen my previous benchmark threads at other forums & your wondering why I'm starting over again it's because the original (long) version of the 213.76 credit WU used for that benchmark has become only sporadically available now. At 1st a short version joined it & so for a while we had both (which confused some people) & then the long 1 disappeared altogether for a time! It is sporadically back now but it just makes things too difficult.
Also I later found out that some people don't run the mod fit WUs (like the 213.76s) because of lower credit & some people can't run them due to hardware limitations (e.g HD 3800s). I did ask at the MW forum originally but no one said anything :p.
So this time I've chosen MW@H v1.02 106.88 credit WU for the benchmark, although it's shorter run times give the illusion of smaller performance gaps between different hardware it'll be easier overall.
Further info.
Current benchmarking thread (http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2384985) at AT
For reference, link to my 1st MW benchmark thread at AnandTech. (http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2366988)
New thread at the Milky Way forums (http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3551) & the KWSN thread (http://www.kwsnforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=205134#205134)
Stock clocks for the above o/ced graphic cards (GPU/RAM MHz):-
HD 5850 ...................... 725/1000
HD 5970 ...................... 725/1000 (dual GPU)
HD 7950 ...................... 800/1250
HD 7950 Boost ............. 850-925/1250
R9 280X ...................... 850-1000/1500
************************************************** ********
Thank god this uses similiar forum s/w as AT, it seems all links & formatting held :)
Btw still trying to gather enough times to add my old CPU to the list, but not getting enough CPU WUs!