Intel Developes 6-8W Atom Server CPUs
Intel Atom S1260 (8.5Watts) 2.0GHz $64
Intel Atom S1240 (6.1Watts) 1.6GHz $n/a
Intel Atom S1220 (8.1 Watts) 1.6GHz $n/a
Sockets Supported: FCBGA1283
http://newsroom.intel.com/community/...lass-processor
http://download.intel.com/newsroom/k...1200_Brief.pdf
Re: Intel Developes 6-8W Atom Server CPUs
Filling a rack with them would be very interesting.
Re: Intel Developes 6-8W Atom Server CPUs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zombie67
Filling a rack with them would be very interesting.
BeoWolf Cluster maybe?
Re: Intel Developes 6-8W Atom Server CPUs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fire$torm
BeoWolf Cluster maybe?
BOINC tasks run more efficiently when it is one task per thread. MT threads are okay when deadline is more important, because over-all performance suffers. Clusters have the same kind of performance loss as MT tasks.
Re: Intel Developes 6-8W Atom Server CPUs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zombie67
BOINC tasks run more efficiently when it is one task per thread. MT threads are okay when deadline is more important, because over-all performance suffers. Clusters have the same kind of performance loss as MT tasks.
Agreed. I created both OpenMP and OpenCL for CPU apps for Collatz and both ran slower than running one task per core. About 3% overall, but that's still 3%.