As we go up the n range, at n=400M, to n=799M, for the same bit level, 70 to 71, wus will be shorten. I’m doing 1200 second a but when we reach n=700M will 600 seconds!!!! Me old ATI card, RTX 2080 on 3-6 seconds per wu.
Printable View
As we go up the n range, at n=400M, to n=799M, for the same bit level, 70 to 71, wus will be shorten. I’m doing 1200 second a but when we reach n=700M will 600 seconds!!!! Me old ATI card, RTX 2080 on 3-6 seconds per wu.
I noticed tonight that the run times are the same, but credits have been halved...from 500 to 250/wu.
That sucks :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Al
Run times will drop as you go high on the n range, you will notice that. Can’t speak for the credits tough.
I'm set up to hit (and stop at) 100M today... was wondering why my calculations were off :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Bryan
That's cool! I was hoping to get there someday but now it is gonna take 2x somedays :DQuote:
Originally Posted by FourOh
On fast wus territory....
And low pay. Great combination. :rolleyes:
Agree with you, can’t answer on behalf of stupidity. I’m reaching a threshold that my old laptop out produces the GPU.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mumps
You can run 2 W/Us with this, will save you 5 seconds per W/U
<app_config>
<app>
<name>TF</name>
<gpu_versions>
<gpu_usage>0.5</gpu_usage>
<cpu_usage>0.5</cpu_usage>
</gpu_versions>
</app>
</app_config>
app_config.xml
Also if you can change the client parameters you can go even faster by 10% but I don’t know hot to do it on boinc client.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave gpu
Looks like Credits are up to 1,200.00 Time to head back for a bit. :cool:
But timings went up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave gpu
when run times were 28 sec on a P100, pay was 170 or 6.07 credit per second
with runtimes at 177 sec on a P100, pay is 1200 or 6.77 credit per second.
it's not that much better
Running a 2070 i getting a run of 16sec = 10.62 a sec =170
New run 88 sec = 13.63 a sec =1,200 Thats good for me. =))
I'm still running it too
Running too but it’s painful, 4500 secs/wu.Quote:
Originally Posted by scole of TSBT
I fill your pain. ~X(Quote:
Originally Posted by pinhodecarlos
Just to give you a heads up on the work SRBase is doing, it will only help GIMPS in 50/80 years from now. Look at this stats: https://www.mersenne.ca/status/tf/0/0/1/10000
SRBase is running on column 71 down. Since 1995 that GIMPS is on line 100M for that table.
I’m pulling off my support, tired of stupidity, really thought they would change approach, to clean line 100M columns 72, 73, and so on. Have fun in there!