Looks like Sic is backing off...
So NOW is the time to get in gear!!
If Moo is in fact closing sometime soon, this could be a permanent #1 :cool:
http://boincstats.com/stats/team_sta...oowrapper&st=0
We closed the gap with around 3.4 Mill yesterday...
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Hopefully I should be adding a 5830 to Moo in about a week. Waiting on some small replacement parts for the card.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Dang! I just made my 10 Mil on Moo and had switched back to DNet, now I gotta go back to Moo.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Did Moo ever fix their muti GPU issues?
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
I am running one machine with dual 5870s. With the core manually set to 3, it has been very stable for me.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zombie67
I am running one machine with dual 5870s. With the core manually set to 3, it has been very stable for me.
I'm running dual 5970s, core manually set to 3, CCC 10.10. Once a week, I get the odd WU that never finishes, but I'm getting 1.2M/day on this box.
Oh, and I dedicated a full core to Moo.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Maxwell
Oh, and I dedicated a full core to Moo.
Yep, me too.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Maxwell
I'm running dual 5970s, core manually set to 3, CCC 10.10. Once a week, I get the odd WU that never finishes, but I'm getting 1.2M/day on this box.
Oh, and I dedicated a full core to Moo.
How do i know which core to dedicate and will moo know to use it?
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Maxwell
I'm running dual 5970s, core manually set to 3, CCC 10.10. Once a week, I get the odd WU that never finishes, but I'm getting 1.2M/day on this box.
Oh, and I dedicated a full core to Moo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mike029
How do i know which core to dedicate and will moo know to use it?
The easy way is to set BOINC to use N-1 in the preferences. You don't need to define which particular core. Maxwell has a much more intricate way, that you may like.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zombie67
The easy way is to set BOINC to use N-1 in the preferences. You don't need to define which particular core. Maxwell has a much more intricate way, that you may like.
Where would I change the settings in Boinc to N-1? Do I need to create an xml file? Would that apply to all my boinc programs? Lastly, would you have a ready made example i could copy and paste?
Thanks.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mike029
Where would I change the settings in Boinc to N-1? Do I need to create an xml file? Would that apply to all my boinc programs? Lastly, would you have a ready made example i could copy and paste?
Thanks.
N = the number of cores (not threads!) you have. So on a quad core, that works out to 4-1=3. So go into BOINCmgr, Advanced -> Preferences. At the bottom of the first tab, change it to 75% of the processors. On an 8 core machine, like a dual quad core xeon, set it to 87.5%.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zombie67
N = the number of cores (not threads!) you have. So on a quad core, that works out to 4-1=3. So go into BOINCmgr, Advanced -> Preferences. At the bottom of the first tab, change it to 75% of the processors. On an 8 core machine, like a dual quad core xeon, set it to 87.5%.
Ahh, got it. Done. On my Sandybridge 2600k with ht, I have it set to use 7 cores for more free Hal. but could adjust it if need be.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mike029
Ahh, got it. Done. On my Sandybridge 2600k with ht, I have it set to use 7 cores for more free Hal. but could adjust it if need be.
Check your GPU and CPU usage (GPU-Z and CPU-Z), with 7 threads vs 6 threads. Keep reducing threads until there is some idle CPU space, and then crank it back up one. Make sure your GPU load is maxed.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zombie67
Check your GPU and CPU usage (GPU-Z and CPU-Z), with 7 threads vs 6 threads. Keep reducing threads until there is some idle CPU space, and then crank it back up one. Make sure your GPU load is maxed.
Or a slightly different tactic - I know you're familiar with Afterburner... I'm currently using that to monitor temps and load. Not using it for overclocking, but I like being able to see all graphs at once...
But yeah. Once I left a core for Moo, load on the GPUs shot up to 97%+ on all of them...
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
On an I7 (even a Sandy Bridge) you may need to leave a full CORE not thread if you are running dual 5870s. On my machine with a 5970 and GTX 570 it takes 26% of the processor. A FULL CORE so even with a V8 you need to set use 75% of processors.
As Maxwell says, the object is for the GPU to be at 97% load full time ... anything less and you are losing credits that the CPU crunching can't touch!
I actually do it another way. Install the program ProLasso (Process Lasso) and using that you can set priority and affinity for all processes. I setup threads 6 and 7 for the Moo GPU programs (dnetcxxxxxx) and set the priority to HIGH. Then for any CPU tasks I set them for threads 0-6 with normal priority. On the 5970/GTX 570 I do the above but I set the primegrid wu to threads 0-6 with HIGH priority.
The benefit to totally isolating the GPU core is that the GPU doesn't have to interrupt a lower priority CPU task to get serviced. Even this minor delay causes a loss of GPU processing.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bryan
On an I7 (even a Sandy Bridge) you may need to leave a full CORE not thread if you are running dual 5870s. On my machine with a 5970 and GTX 570 it takes 26% of the processor. A FULL CORE so even with a V8 you need to set use 75% of processors.
As Maxwell says, the object is for the GPU to be at 97% load full time ... anything less and you are losing credits that the CPU crunching can't touch!
I actually do it another way. Install the program ProLasso (Process Lasso) and using that you can set priority and affinity for all processes. I setup threads 6 and 7 for the Moo GPU programs (dnetcxxxxxx) and set the priority to HIGH. Then for any CPU tasks I set them for threads 0-6 with normal priority. On the 5970/GTX 570 I do the above but I set the primegrid wu to threads 0-6 with HIGH priority.
The benefit to totally isolating the GPU core is that the GPU doesn't have to interrupt a lower priority CPU task to get serviced. Even this minor delay causes a loss of GPU processing.
Yeah. Me too. I do what Bryan does. With the exception that I have an AMD box, do 1 core = 1 thread for me... ;)
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Just to let everyone on the Moo team know that it isn't a lack of interest that I haven't posted on the OTHER Moo thread. I can read anything in the team area but I can't post ... so I'm all ears! :)
No Joker this isn't the time to take advantage ... remember I get even!
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
No Joker this isn't the time to take advantage ... remember I get even!
So.......I CANT grab your ears??? =))=))=))
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
joker
So.......I CANT grab your ears??? =))=))=))
No, and I don't have a flat head either so you have to hold your beer :)
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
No, and I don't have a flat head either so you have to hold your beer
Life just sucks more every day!! =))=))=))=))
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Sic should be toast in a few days so will head home after the weekend.
Apologies for the reduced output.....trying to work on my Collatz 100m.
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Not anymore, they just passed us in the Project for Total Credit, probably not much we can do about it since they are putting out 10 Million more a day than we are ... 3:-O
Re: Looks like Sic is backing off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
STE\/E
Not anymore, they just passed us in the Project for Total Credit, probably not much we can do about it since they are putting out 10 Million more a day than we are ... 3:-O
Perhaps not now but we are going to be relevant once again.