Re: Einstein paying better?
That newer app seems to be paying fairly well. I also recently started working on E@H again. Need that 5m.
Re: Einstein paying better?
It's paying about 3x better than the Parkes app. Here's an up to date app_config to run 2x concurrent:
<app_config>
<app>
<name>einstein_O1MD1CV</name>
<gpu_versions>
<gpu_usage>.5</gpu_usage>
<cpu_usage>.5</cpu_usage>
</gpu_versions>
</app>
<app>
<name>hsgamma_FGRPB1G</name>
<gpu_versions>
<gpu_usage>.5</gpu_usage>
<cpu_usage>.5</cpu_usage>
</gpu_versions>
</app>
</app_config>
Re: Einstein paying better?
Re: Einstein paying better?
I wish I would have doubled up the concurrency on the 7970 sooner. I went from ~700sec per wu to ~1150 with two running. So twice the credit but only 60% slower.
Edit: watch your vram usage, i'm currently seeing 1600MB with 2 going.
Re: Einstein paying better?
For a point of reference a GTX 1080 does 2 in 1025s. It does 4 in 1997s so 4 is actually a little faster. I don't care about the credits but I need 1 itty bitty star to get a big star on WuProp :D
BTW 4 takes 3755M of VRAM on Nvidia.
Re: Einstein paying better?
I've been running einstein on a 270x and 7970 for about 6 days straight. The 7970 runs them faster and thus goes through more work units than the 270x. The weird thing is the 270x has 7 pages of pendings while the 7970 is only on 3. All WUs on this app are quorum 2.
Re: Einstein paying better?
Maybe an issue comparing different aps? Could the 7970 GPU be pairing up with like performance cards and the 270x is pairing up with a larger collection of slower cards? Or even you're hitting scole as you wingmate more often on the 270X so you're stuck waiting for his fictional 50 GPU's to get to the tasks? :D
Re: Einstein paying better?
Are you making fun of my collection of slower cards? :p
Re: Einstein paying better?
I'm making fun of your collection of "50 GPU's" in a single system for caching purposes. :))
I'm the one with the slower cards. (You would be hard pressed to find *anyone* with as many cards as I have with an average GFLOPs even close to as miserable as mine.)
lol
Re: Einstein paying better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mumps
I'm making fun of your collection of "50 GPU's" in a single system for caching purposes. :))
I'm the one with the slower cards. (You would be hard pressed to find *anyone* with as many cards as I have with an average GFLOPs even close to as miserable as mine.)
lol
Do you actually have any cards that are measured in Gflops? =))
Re: Einstein paying better?
Pretty sure I still run a couple measured in MFLOPS. :)
Re: Einstein paying better?
I have a few cards that just went FLOP. :-|
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Einstein paying better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mumps
I'm making fun of your collection of "50 GPU's" in a single system...
You mean this rig :)
Attachment 2660
Re: Einstein paying better?
That's unreal. Can't imagine what it can do.
Re: Einstein paying better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
denim
That's unreal. Can't imagine what it can do.
That's actually a scrypt mining setup. I don't know the guy. I just ran across the pic one day.
Re: Einstein paying better?
Hey that's only 30gpus, unless they're 5970/7990? He probably had to sell that lambo for the electricity.
Re: Einstein paying better?
So this was my wingman on a very long Einstein wu...and this wingman errored it out at 374k seconds. I guess I'd expect more out of my hardware. ;)
Re: Einstein paying better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sphynx
Bummer...man, what we wouldn't give for that rig in the Pentathlon, huh? :D
Re: Einstein paying better?
Just ask Dr Bruce nicely to join our team for any Einstein leg. :) He used to be at my local state college campus. :)