Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 46

Thread: New project: Minecraft@Home

  1. #1
    Diamond Member
    zombie67's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 24th, 2010
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    7,269

    New project: Minecraft@Home

    https://minecraftathome.com/minecrafthome/

    GPU only, for win and linux.

    Also, it currently has the same problem as SRBase. A machine with multiple GPUs, all the tasks are running at the same time on just one of the GPUs. And the rest of the GPUs are idle.

    How to work around this is here: https://minecraftathome.com/minecraf...2&postid=35#35
    "Don't confront me with my failures, I had not forgotten them" - Jackson Browne

    Avatar source


  2. #2
    Administrator
    Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 27th, 2010
    Location
    CO summer, TX winter
    Posts
    6,457

    Re: New project: Minecraft@Home

    They've dropped the credits from 42k/WU to 6k ... dang!


  3. #3
    Platinum Member
    Mumps's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 28th, 2010
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    3,994

    Re: New project: Minecraft@Home

    And the two old AMD's I threw at it aren't getting any work. Oh well.

  4. #4
    Administrator
    Ron Shurtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 15th, 2010
    Location
    Topeka, Kansas
    Posts
    975

    Re: New project: Minecraft@Home

    My tasks have now gone from 6.3K to 7K.
    Still no where near 42K, but I'll take it.

  5. #5
    Diamond Member
    zombie67's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 24th, 2010
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    7,269

    Re: New project: Minecraft@Home

    Looks like they should have multi-GPU support very soon.

    https://minecraftathome.com/minecraf...hread.php?id=6
    "Don't confront me with my failures, I had not forgotten them" - Jackson Browne

    Avatar source


  6. #6
    Gold Member
    FourOh's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 16th, 2013
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    1,036

    Re: New project: Minecraft@Home

    Here's what I'm seeing:

    GPU Avg Time PPD
    1050 Ti 7000 80,000
    GTX 970 4650 121,250
    GTX 1660 Ti 3757 150,000
    GTX 1070 3315 170,000
    GTX 1080 Ti 2810 201,000
    RTX 2080 Super 2650 424,000
    RTX 2080 Ti 2612 440,000
    Tesla P100 1918 587,000

    I see at least one 2070 outperforming the 2080/2080S averages on this list... any ideas on GPU OC for this project? Memory or clock speed?
    Last edited by FourOh; 07-05-20 at 05:13 PM.



  7. #7
    Platinum Member
    Mumps's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 28th, 2010
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    3,994

    Re: New project: Minecraft@Home

    So, are those your systems? Or samplings from the project? I have an Ubuntu 18.04.4 host running a 1050 TI with no overclock and it's running WU's in 6800 seconds for me. I also need to get my Dual 750TI system configured to exclude one of the GPU's, because it looks like it's been running two at a time on just one of the GPU's. As mentioned elsewhere. But it looks like even that card was running around 12,400 seconds on singles, and 19,200 seconds on duals.

    No clues or hints for OC though.

  8. #8
    Diamond Member
    zombie67's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 24th, 2010
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    7,269

    Re: New project: Minecraft@Home

    App is updated to allow multiple GPUs as well as other features.

    https://minecraftathome.com/minecraf...read.php?id=14
    "Don't confront me with my failures, I had not forgotten them" - Jackson Browne

    Avatar source


  9. #9
    Gold Member
    FourOh's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 16th, 2013
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    1,036

    Re: New project: Minecraft@Home

    Quote Originally Posted by Mumps View Post
    So, are those your systems? Or samplings from the project? I have an Ubuntu 18.04.4 host running a 1050 TI with no overclock and it's running WU's in 6800 seconds for me. I also need to get my Dual 750TI system configured to exclude one of the GPU's, because it looks like it's been running two at a time on just one of the GPU's. As mentioned elsewhere. But it looks like even that card was running around 12,400 seconds on singles, and 19,200 seconds on duals.

    No clues or hints for OC though.
    Some are mine, some are sampled from project stats. One thing is for sure, it likes the Tesla P100!



  10. #10
    Platinum Member
    Mumps's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 28th, 2010
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    3,994

    Re: New project: Minecraft@Home

    Quote Originally Posted by FourOh View Post
    Here's what I'm seeing:

    GPU Avg Time PPD
    1050 Ti 7000 165,000
    GTX 970 4650 121,250
    GTX 1660 Ti 3757 150,000
    GTX 1070 872 148,624
    GTX 1080 Ti 3300 170,000
    RTX 2080 Super 2650 424,000
    RTX 2080 Ti 2612 440,000
    Tesla P100 1918 587,000

    I see at least one 2070 outperforming the 2080/2080S averages on this list... any ideas on GPU OC for this project? Memory or clock speed?
    So, I'll presume the seconds per WU on the 1070 is a typo? The PPD looks like maybe it's actually 3872 seconds? And how is the 1050TI at 7000 seconds avg doing better PPD than the 1080 TI at 3300 seconds? Unless the 1050TI is doing 2 WU's at a time?

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •