Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Who cares to help with the left overs on NFS@Home?

  1. #1
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    August 16th, 2012
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Posts
    1,314

    Who cares to help with the left overs on NFS@Home?

    When wu's are aborted or left behind sometimes it delays the completion of a NFS sieve work.
    Greg, the administrator of NFS, can re-direct these type of work to individual not for an entire team. His question, and also my question, is for only 64-bit linux users although window users are welcome, who is willing to help to clean the left overs?
    Please post here your NFS@Home nickname so I can give Greg a list. Also tell me if you will be staying active for the duration of the two challenges.
    The behave of BOINC cleaning the left overs is very simple, you will get new and old wu's to be done as fast as you can while boinc itself aborts wu's already done by others faster than you. With this strategy we can easily clean the sieve of 2,1049+.

    Thank you.

    Carlos

  2. #2
    Past Administrator
    DrPop's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2010
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    7,635

    Re: Who cares to help with the left overs on NFS@Home?

    Hi Carlos, I may as well stay on it. I only have Win x64 though. Anyway, whatever he wants to send to the Drpop account, I will crunch it.

  3. #3
    Gold Member
    Slicker's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25th, 2010
    Location
    South of Cheeseland
    Posts
    1,253

    Re: Who cares to help with the left overs on NFS@Home?

    I know BOINC is supposed to have some setting which allows work to be directed to machines which return work faster so jobs that have to get resent will get resent to hosts that not only complete tasks but complete them within a set time frame. I've never used it on Collatz so I can't give specifics but I know that the logic is in the server code so it is probably documented somewhere on the BOINC wiki.
    Spring 2008 Race: (1st Place)

  4. #4
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    August 16th, 2012
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Posts
    1,314

    Re: Who cares to help with the left overs on NFS@Home?

    Quote Originally Posted by Slicker View Post
    I know BOINC is supposed to have some setting which allows work to be directed to machines which return work faster so jobs that have to get resent will get resent to hosts that not only complete tasks but complete them within a set time frame. I've never used it on Collatz so I can't give specifics but I know that the logic is in the server code so it is probably documented somewhere on the BOINC wiki.
    If I am not mistaken Greg uses a script for NFS@Home made by him.

  5. #5
    Silver Member
    kmanley57's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 1st, 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    193

    Re: Who cares to help with the left overs on NFS@Home?

    I am currently running two Linux 64-bit boxes on NFS, but I am sure nobody noticed! I will be running both challenge parts also. So I could help clean up, ran resent WU's on a couple on other projects. Getting a WU to finish in minutes is kind of exciting sometimes!

    same alias: kmanley57

    If I forget this alias, they better kick the dirt in on me.
    BOINC Sees it - BOINC DOES it!



  6. #6
    Platinum Member
    denim's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 1st, 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    2,896

    Re: Who cares to help with the left overs on NFS@Home?

    Killing me here, now I have to get a x64 linux box.

  7. #7
    Diamond Member
    Duke of Buckingham's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 14th, 2011
    Location
    Lisboa = Portugal
    Posts
    8,433

    Re: Who cares to help with the left overs on NFS@Home?

    Quote Originally Posted by denim View Post
    Killing me here, now I have to get a x64 linux box.


    Hello denim my friend that is the spirit.

    The team spirit ...
    Friends are like diamonds and diamonds are forever



  8. #8
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    August 16th, 2012
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Posts
    1,314

    Re: Who cares to help with the left overs on NFS@Home?

    Quote Originally Posted by denim View Post
    Killing me here, now I have to get a x64 linux box.
    You can help too as I said. Windows users are welcome.
    Also soon a new win64 build will be available....you can read the thread here: http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=18043

  9. #9
    Platinum Member
    denim's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 1st, 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    2,896

    Re: Who cares to help with the left overs on NFS@Home?

    Quote Originally Posted by pinhodecarlos View Post
    You can help too as I said. Windows users are welcome.
    Also soon a new win64 build will be available....you can read the thread here: http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=18043
    For sure, would love to do it.

  10. #10
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    August 16th, 2012
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Posts
    1,314

    Re: Who cares to help with the left overs on NFS@Home?

    I will also help cleaning the left overs after I am finish with my 13 days post-processing job I am running for NFS@Home. The job I am running is here: http://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/crunching_e.php and log output from an Intel® Core™ i7-3630QM with 16 GB DDR 1600 MHz of memory running msieve:

    Code:
    Sat Apr  6 09:09:52 2013  commencing linear algebra
    Sat Apr  6 09:09:53 2013  read 11995861 cycles
    Sat Apr  6 09:10:16 2013  cycles contain 38293262 unique relations
    Sat Apr  6 09:26:59 2013  read 38293262 relations
    Sat Apr  6 09:28:07 2013  using 20 quadratic characters above 2147483238
    Sat Apr  6 09:30:44 2013  building initial matrix
    Sat Apr  6 09:38:17 2013  memory use: 5019.5 MB
    Sat Apr  6 09:38:22 2013  read 11995861 cycles
    Sat Apr  6 09:38:24 2013  matrix is 11995684 x 11995861 (5191.2 MB) with weight 1489055082 (124.13/col)
    Sat Apr  6 09:38:24 2013  sparse part has weight 1240874977 (103.44/col)
    Sat Apr  6 09:40:59 2013  filtering completed in 2 passes
    Sat Apr  6 09:41:02 2013  matrix is 11995169 x 11995346 (5191.1 MB) with weight 1489035519 (124.13/col)
    Sat Apr  6 09:41:02 2013  sparse part has weight 1240866428 (103.45/col)
    Sat Apr  6 09:42:28 2013  matrix starts at (0, 0)
    Sat Apr  6 09:42:30 2013  matrix is 11995169 x 11995346 (5191.1 MB) with weight 1489035519 (124.13/col)
    Sat Apr  6 09:42:30 2013  sparse part has weight 1240866428 (103.45/col)
    Sat Apr  6 09:42:30 2013  saving the first 48 matrix rows for later
    Sat Apr  6 09:42:32 2013  matrix includes 64 packed rows
    Sat Apr  6 09:42:34 2013  matrix is 11995121 x 11995346 (4996.9 MB) with weight 1264920585 (105.45/col)
    Sat Apr  6 09:42:34 2013  sparse part has weight 1189965917 (99.20/col)
    Sat Apr  6 09:42:34 2013  using block size 262144 for processor cache size 6144 kB
    Sat Apr  6 09:42:58 2013  commencing Lanczos iteration (8 threads)
    Sat Apr  6 09:42:58 2013  memory use: 6648.9 MB
    Sat Apr  6 09:45:21 2013  linear algebra at 0.0%, ETA 301h28m
    Sat Apr  6 09:46:06 2013  checkpointing every 40000 dimensions
    Carlos

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •