Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Seventeen or Bust drive

  1. #11
    Gold Member
    trigggl's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 6th, 2010
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,077

    Re: Seventeen or Bust drive

    I just had one of these validate this week. It had been pending for 3 months. The wingman that finally finished it did it with a runtime of 2 million seconds.
    6r39 7r199



  2. #12
    Gold Member
    cineon_lut's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 8th, 2013
    Location
    California, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,477

    Re: Seventeen or Bust drive

    Quote Originally Posted by trigggl View Post
    I just had one of these validate this week. It had been pending for 3 months. The wingman that finally finished it did it with a runtime of 2 million seconds.
    So true, when mine validate all get a nice new badge and a gold status on wuprop! They're just sitting in the pending pile now. This one is going to be a while!


    Vic (mobile)

  3. #13
    Gold Member
    Slicker's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25th, 2010
    Location
    South of Cheeseland
    Posts
    1,253

    Re: Seventeen or Bust drive

    Quote Originally Posted by pinhodecarlos View Post
    Their status page shows that some candidates have been now searched up to 7.8 million digits. They certainly seem overdue for a prime

    Ummmmm... if primes followed a pattern and could be predicted, there wouldn't be the need for a search, would there? If you roll a die three times in a row and get a two each time, what are the odds of getting a two on the next roll? One in six. Previous results have no effect on the odds of the next roll. What we know from the patterns is that as numbers get larger, primes tend to be further and further apart. But, we can't extrapolate when the next one will be found as there is no real way of knowing that. Given that the number of digits doubled since the last prime was found, one begins to to question whether the 17 or bust concept holds true for really large numbers or whether it was just a coincidence that it worked for smaller numbers. Then again, a prime could be found at any time. Then again, the odds can't be any worse than stumbling upon a number which may prove the collatz conjecture wrong.
    Spring 2008 Race: (1st Place)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •