Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: intel hit with chipset design flaw in sandy bridge rollout

  1. #1
    Silver Member
    bmwr606's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25th, 2010
    Posts
    126

    Exclamation intel hit with chipset design flaw in sandy bridge rollout

    Hold off on that sandy bridge upgrade!

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/intel-...57?tag=nl.e539



  2. #2
    Past Administrator
    Fire$torm's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2010
    Location
    In the Big City
    Posts
    7,938

    Re: intel hit with chipset design flaw in sandy bridge rollout

    Quote Originally Posted by bmwr606 View Post
    Hold off on that sandy bridge upgrade!

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/intel-...57?tag=nl.e539
    WOW, what a goof that was. So anyone who has purchased a new LGA 1155 motherboard will have to RMA it.


    Future Maker? Teensy 3.6

  3. #3
    Administrator
    STMahlberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 1st, 2010
    Location
    AREA 51
    Posts
    1,533

    Re: intel hit with chipset design flaw in sandy bridge rollout

    Quote Originally Posted by bmwr606 View Post
    Hold off on that sandy bridge upgrade!

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/intel-...57?tag=nl.e539
    Somebody's out of a job.
    "My god! Do we really suck, or is this guy really that good?" - Mr Hertz - Shoot 'Em Up






  4. #4
    Past Administrator
    DrPop's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2010
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    7,635

    Re: intel hit with chipset design flaw in sandy bridge rollout

    Talk about AMD saved by the bell...again! Now, if they can just get their act together and roll out Bulldozer soon and without any major hiccups, they just might have a chance for some positive media press!

  5. #5
    Silver Member
    Aux10's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 29th, 2010
    Location
    HELP! I'm lost!
    Posts
    215

    Re: intel hit with chipset design flaw in sandy bridge rollout

    Wow... Good thing I didn't start a new build yet this year...
    Cruncher Status
    Kuro Chan: Offline Glacies: Online P/T

  6. #6
    Administrator
    STMahlberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 1st, 2010
    Location
    AREA 51
    Posts
    1,533

    Re: intel hit with chipset design flaw in sandy bridge rollout

    Quote Originally Posted by DrPop View Post
    Talk about AMD saved by the bell...again! Now, if they can just get their act together and roll out Bulldozer soon and without any major hiccups, they just might have a chance for some positive media press!
    Thank you Intel... my AMD stock is up 4%.
    "My god! Do we really suck, or is this guy really that good?" - Mr Hertz - Shoot 'Em Up






  7. #7
    Past Administrator
    Fire$torm's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2010
    Location
    In the Big City
    Posts
    7,938

    Re: intel hit with chipset design flaw in sandy bridge rollout

    Quote Originally Posted by STMahlberg View Post
    Thank you Intel... my AMD stock is up 4%.
    AMD Corporation


    Future Maker? Teensy 3.6

  8. #8
    Past Administrator
    DrPop's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2010
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    7,635

    Re: intel hit with chipset design flaw in sandy bridge rollout

    Quote Originally Posted by Fire$torm View Post
    AMD Corporation
    Hey, now! I'm counting on these guys to make Bulldozer SO GOOD that I won't be tempted to build up anything else later this year. The technology they're proposing should close the performance gap - and that's the only way prices will come down!

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    John R.@SETI.USA's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 3rd, 2010
    Location
    Huntsville, Alabama
    Posts
    28

    Re: intel hit with chipset design flaw in sandy bridge rollout

    Well.....phooey......I'm caught in the middle of this too.......but, I'm feeling just a little better after reading this email from the Egg......Looks like I will still have to replace the MOBO though.........


    Thank you for giving us the opportunity to serve you. Newegg has recently become aware of a design issue that is affecting recent models of Intel Sandy Bridge platform motherboards. We are working with Intel to identify the exact nature of this problem.

    As always, Newegg remains 100% committed to our customers' total satisfaction. In keeping with our commitment to our customers, we are extending the return period for your motherboard by 90 days or until replacements become available from the manufacturer, whichever is greater. Intel expects to have a new revision of the P67 & H67 chipsets out around April, at which point first-run motherboards with this issue will need to be physically replaced in affected systems.

    From a technical standpoint, the design issue can be bypassed fairly simply by not using the Serial ATA (SATA) ports that are affected. Your motherboard’s manual should identify your SATA ports by number, and at a minimum you should see ports 0-5 (6 ports in total) listed. Ports 0 and 1 are Sata Rev. III (6Gbps), and do not appear to be affected by this problem. Ports 2-5 are SATA Rev. II (3Gbps) and should not be used. For a thorough explanation of this hardware work-around, please refer to our video on YouTube:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJcE2alQPvY

    If you choose to use the hardware work-around option, there is no need to contact us at this time. We have your information on record and will email you as soon as the replacements become available. If you would like to discuss this with our tech community or read up on the latest updates, please visit our EggXpert forum:
    http://www.eggxpert.com/forums/thread/682006.aspx

    If none of the above options are suitable to your needs and you wish to return the board at this time for a full refund, please email us at intelsandybridge@newegg.com and include your sales order number so we can help you out with your return.

    If you have any concerns, please contact Newegg Customer Service for further information and assistance.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •