MM is short for "Mega Milestone". Several of us around here like trying to get big milestones on as many projects as we can. For example, Mumps has 28 2.5M MMs, which means he has gotten at least 2.5 Million credits in 28 projects (which happens to put him #1 in the world in that category by 8).
Free-DC tracks them. It's a cool way to measure breadth of crunching.
the MM group by far is the most active group.
People do not grow old no matter how long we live. We never cease to stand like curious children before the great Mystery into which we
DNETC
3,093.52 1,547.47 816.00 DNETC@Home v1.02 (cuda31)
MOO
13,443.43 6,699.76 10,685.56 Distributed.net Client v1.01 (cuda31)
PG
1,756.59 67.88 4,523.00 Proth Prime Search (Sieve) v1.39 (cuda23)
Already looking forward to my next video card as ATI rather then Nvidia.
For me I have 3 5850s crunching, two on dnetc and one on moo.
dnetc gives this:
Moo gives this:550.13 32.37 3,264.00
548.04 31.76 3,264.00
549.21 30.98 3,264.00
546.29 31.75 3,264.00
dnetc is way better and works with dual card setups.1,377.97 28.72 3,842.00
1,379.36 28.66 3,808.00
1,768.11 36.93 4,896.00
1,367.17 30.39 3,808.00
I'm seeing about the same credit level on Moo that I saw on DNETC (before they crashed). On Moo for the dual card setup you can't go by the numbers posted for CPU/run time. You have to look in the stderr record and subtract the start time from the end time. However, on my single card 5870 system the times reported are the same as the stderr.