Originally Posted by
DrPop
I've been thinking about this the last couple days. At what point does a project's worthwhile direction over ride the crappy credits? I mean, if we all crunched crappy paying projects, our RAC would be 1/2 of what it is now. So at what point do most of us think "boost the team total" or "I'd rather crunch a cool but crap credit project"?Note that I think this is a very different argument and decision than that faced by a strictly MM cruncher, who will crunch them all in due time.Thing is, I could almost be pursuaded to crunch Einstein again, because it is one of the few projects outside the theoretical math projects, that has even accomplished anything at all!