Quote Originally Posted by DrPop View Post
I've been thinking about this the last couple days. At what point does a project's worthwhile direction over ride the crappy credits? I mean, if we all crunched crappy paying projects, our RAC would be 1/2 of what it is now. So at what point do most of us think "boost the team total" or "I'd rather crunch a cool but crap credit project"?Note that I think this is a very different argument and decision than that faced by a strictly MM cruncher, who will crunch them all in due time.Thing is, I could almost be pursuaded to crunch Einstein again, because it is one of the few projects outside the theoretical math projects, that has even accomplished anything at all!
That is what the "core" is for. Most of our team is people that crunch what they want regardless of credits.