Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Running, High Priority

  1. #1
    Gold Member
    artemis8's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2012
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    1,093

    Running, High Priority

    I've never noticed this before, but now a bunch of my WCG wus their status is Running, High Priority. They are pushing out all my other projects to not run, so that they can run. I like WCG and all, but I don't want all my cores on it. Is this normal, or most likely a temporary things? Thanks!





  2. #2
    Diamond Member
    zombie67's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 24th, 2010
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    7,381

    Re: Running, High Priority

    Quote Originally Posted by artemis8 View Post
    I've never noticed this before, but now a bunch of my WCG wus their status is Running, High Priority. They are pushing out all my other projects to not run, so that they can run. I like WCG and all, but I don't want all my cores on it. Is this normal, or most likely a temporary things? Thanks!
    This is normal behavior, when BOINC thinks there is risk to returning tasks in time. Resource share does not mean assigning cores. For example, on a quad core, you may have two projects, set to 25 for project A and 75 for Project B. It does not mean one core gets A, and the other three cores get B. It may decide to run all four cores on A for a while, and then switch to all four on B for a while. But over time, long term, it should average 25% for A, and 75% for B. For the short term, the priority is to return tasks on time, that are already downloaded.
    "Don't confront me with my failures, I had not forgotten them" - Jackson Browne

    Avatar source


  3. #3
    Gold Member
    Slicker's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25th, 2010
    Location
    South of Cheeseland
    Posts
    1,253

    Re: Running, High Priority

    BOINC may get it right some or even most of the time, but certainly not all of the time. I have see it run mini_collatz apps which take 5 hours on a CPU get kicked into high priority even though the deadline is 5 days away and the WUs are 50% done. That's just bad math.

    If you don't want BOINC to switch projects for you, stick to one project at a time.

    Or, choose two projects and set the resource of one of them at 0 which (if BOINC isn't broke again) should run it only if the other project is down or out of work.

    Unfortunately, with the second scenario, the backup project won't get just one WU per core if the primary project is unavailablebut will rather fill the entire cache with WUs from the backup project. After the primary project is back online, the backup will often continue to run for quite some time - unless you have your cache size set very, very low. That sure isn't my definition of a backup project. Recent changes in how it caches work in the 7.x.x clients has confused things even more as the cache settings don't work the same way they used to work.
    Spring 2008 Race: (1st Place)

  4. #4
    Gold Member
    artemis8's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2012
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    1,093

    Re: Running, High Priority

    yeah these 'high priority' ones have a deadline of 2/22. Plenty of time, if you ask me. Some in the same project are due before then, even some due on 2/17. Oh well. Thanks for the tips guys.





Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •