Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: FreeHAL: Longer run times?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Platinum Member
    denim's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 1st, 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    2,896

    Thumbs down Re: FreeHAL: Longer run times?

    On my quad-core at work, I am steady getting 3 WU's finish in normal time, and the 4th running really long.

  2. #2
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    June 1st, 2011
    Location
    Terra Incognito
    Posts
    1,012

    Re: FreeHAL: Longer run times?

    Seeing this on my box as well. 6 of 8 finish early. The last 2 take another 4 hours. So, i'm losing 4 hours of work for the 6 other tasks, since no new tasks will download until all 8 have completed. Aborting the long tasks might start a new download of tasks, but that takes a lot of micro managing. Of course, then you would lose the work done. Probably not worth the effort. I can't see any way of choosing tasks size in the prefs.

  3. #3
    Past Admin
    Mike029's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 24th, 2010
    Location
    Bronx, New York
    Posts
    3,377

    Re: FreeHAL: Longer run times?

    Quote Originally Posted by spingadus View Post
    Seeing this on my box as well. 6 of 8 finish early. The last 2 take another 4 hours. So, i'm losing 4 hours of work for the 6 other tasks, since no new tasks will download until all 8 have completed. Aborting the long tasks might start a new download of tasks, but that takes a lot of micro managing. Of course, then you would lose the work done. Probably not worth the effort. I can't see any way of choosing tasks size in the prefs.
    Just another reason I stopped running this. I also found that FH was slowing down my gpus.



  4. #4
    Administrator
    Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 27th, 2010
    Location
    CO summer, TX winter
    Posts
    6,457

    Re: FreeHAL: Longer run times?

    I'm surprised that the guy that was tauted as a "boy genius" can't figure out how to issue the same sized WU on a single work request. Brilliant, absolutely brilliant. I too have stopped running the project.


  5. #5
    Platinum Member
    John P. Myers's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 13th, 2011
    Location
    Jackson, TN
    Posts
    4,502

    Re: FreeHAL: Longer run times?

    Got one going now that's expected to finish in 2 hours for a total runtime of 10 hours. Also noticed it's taking about 256MB RAM to run it, where a single Poem GPU app uses half that. This will be my last FH.


  6. #6
    Diamond Member
    zombie67's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 24th, 2010
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    7,328

    Re: FreeHAL: Longer run times?

    Hmm. I don't see any slow-down running FH. To me, it's all just free upside..
    "Don't confront me with my failures, I had not forgotten them" - Jackson Browne

    Avatar source


  7. #7
    Administrator
    Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 27th, 2010
    Location
    CO summer, TX winter
    Posts
    6,457

    Re: FreeHAL: Longer run times?

    Quote Originally Posted by zombie67 View Post
    Hmm. I don't see any slow-down running FH. To me, it's all just free upside..
    There are 2 different sized WU being issued by the project. If you get 7 of the shorter ones and 1 or more of the longer ones then all the cores that had crunched the short WU sit idle for a couple of hours waiting for the last WU to finish. It won't ask for work until ALL WU have completed.

    Yes, somewhat free credits, but no where near what you could get if the WU size was matched on each download.


  8. #8
    Platinum Member
    John P. Myers's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 13th, 2011
    Location
    Jackson, TN
    Posts
    4,502

    Re: FreeHAL: Longer run times?

    Quote Originally Posted by zombie67 View Post
    Hmm. I don't see any slow-down running FH. To me, it's all just free upside..
    Since ending FH i've noticed Poem WUs complete about 7%-10% faster. Fluke? Maybe. I'll keep a watch on it and see if that trend continues.

    However Mike029 reports the same thing, though not sure of his increase %


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •