Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58

Thread: 2,1037- sieve

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    August 16th, 2012
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Posts
    1,314

    Re: 2,1037- sieve

    Last 16e Lattice Sieve application wu received is at ~q=849M.
    Last 16e Lattice Sieve V5 application wu received is at ~q=932M (third chunk restarted at 30M going to 950M: meaning going backwards from 1,000M until meet 16e in the middle).
    Last 16e Lattice Sieve V5 application already sent all wu's from 950M to 1,400M.

    Overall Q range sieve of 2,1037- started at 20M to 1,400M.

    Q range situation is this:
    20M-849M (sent through 16e application, remaining wu's close to be done)
    849M-930M (unsent)
    930M-932M (sent, remaining wu's close to be done)
    932M-950M (unsent)
    950M-1400M (sent through 16e V5 application, remaining wu's close to be done)

    Lot's of aborted wu's being done on the range below 800M.

    If you are only running lasieve5f application please consider also checking lasievef application. Linux user will run both, windows users only lasievef.

    Carlos Pinho

  2. #2
    Platinum Member
    Mumps's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 28th, 2010
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    3,994

    Re: 2,1037- sieve

    Quote Originally Posted by pinhodecarlos View Post
    Last 16e Lattice Sieve application wu received is at ~q=849M.
    Last 16e Lattice Sieve V5 application wu received is at ~q=932M (third chunk restarted at 30M going to 950M: meaning going backwards from 1,000M until meet 16e in the middle).
    Last 16e Lattice Sieve V5 application already sent all wu's from 950M to 1,400M.

    Overall Q range sieve of 2,1037- started at 20M to 1,400M.

    Q range situation is this:
    20M-849M (sent through 16e application, remaining wu's close to be done)
    849M-930M (unsent)
    930M-932M (sent, remaining wu's close to be done)
    932M-950M (unsent)
    950M-1400M (sent through 16e V5 application, remaining wu's close to be done)

    Lot's of aborted wu's being done on the range below 800M.

    If you are only running lasieve5f application please consider also checking lasievef application. Linux user will run both, windows users only lasievef.

    Carlos Pinho
    Just curious, did we actually finish the 11,301- Sieving during these challenges? I see what looks like the number listed as Sieving, but Detailed status indicates it's moved to Post Processing.

    Also, 2,1037- doesn't match up to anything I can find on the Detailed status pages for sieve_d or sieve_e. Do they not show all the numbers in the Detailed status pages?

    EDIT: Yeah, there it is. 5 days ago in the Project News. Which I don't remember seeing in our RSS feed here...
    Last edited by Mumps; 12-23-12 at 11:05 AM.

  3. #3
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    August 16th, 2012
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Posts
    1,314

    Re: 2,1037- sieve

    Quote Originally Posted by Mumps View Post
    Just curious, did we actually finish the 11,301- Sieving during these challenges? I see what looks like the number listed as Sieving, but Detailed status indicates it's moved to Post Processing.

    Also, 2,1037- doesn't match up to anything I can find on the Detailed status pages for sieve_d or sieve_e. Do they not show all the numbers in the Detailed status pages?

    EDIT: Yeah, there it is. 5 days ago in the Project News. Which I don't remember seeing in our RSS feed here...
    Post-processing of 11,301+ was started before the challenges 1st of December, check attach with log file. Application used was lasievee (44 points per wu, less than 1GB necessary).
    11,301- sieve was ended during the challenges. Currently being post-processed by M. Vang on a core i7 with 16 GB of memory. Relation file zipped is 19 GB. Last wu's gathered entered it at 22nd of December.

    For integers being sieved by applications lasievef and lasieve5f it is very difficult to estimate how much wu's are necessary so there's no progress or detailed page as are for applications lasieved and lasievee. Here we are working on advancing the state of the art of factoring. As I said before, more wu's for 2,1037- can be necessary to generate if a matrix, for the linear algebra phase, is not built.

    Carlos Pinho

    S11p301.zip

  4. #4
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    August 16th, 2012
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Posts
    1,314

    Re: 2,1037- sieve

    Last 16e Lattice Sieve application wu received is at ~q=910M.
    Last 16e Lattice Sieve V5 application already sent all wu's from 930M to 1,400M.

    Overall Q range sieve of 2,1037- started at 20M to 1,400M.

    Q range situation is this:
    20M-910M (sent through 16e application, remaining wu's close to be done)
    910M-930M (unsent throgh 16e application)
    930M-1400M (sent through 16e V5 application, remaining wu's close to be done)

    16e V5 application started another number (2,1049+) from q=1000M because all wu's for 2,1037- have been distributed. Only missing the left overs wu's. Also I only gave order to my CPU to do the 16e Lattice Sieve wu's instead of both 16 and 16e V5.

    Carlos Pinho
    Last edited by pinhodecarlos; 12-23-12 at 06:28 PM.

  5. #5
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    August 16th, 2012
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Posts
    1,314

    Re: 2,1037- sieve

    Last 16e Lattice Sieve application wu received is at ~q=921M.
    16e Lattice Sieve V5 application already sent all wu's from 930M to 1,400M.

    Overall Q range sieve of 2,1037- started at 20M to 1,400M.

    Q range situation is this:
    20M-921M (sent through 16e application, remaining wu's close to be done)
    921M-930M (unsent through 16e application)
    930M-1400M (sent through 16e V5 application, remaining wu's close to be done)

    16e V5 application started another number (2,1049+) from q=1000M because all wu's for 2,1037- have been distributed. Only missing the left overs wu's. Also I only gave order to my CPU to do the 16e Lattice Sieve wu's instead of both 16 and 16e V5 applications respectively.

    In conclusion, 2,1037- will be completely sieved by the end of the year.
    After next phase (post-processing) finishes by using the 512 core cluster, Greg usually writes a simple 2-3 pages article about the factorization with final figures. Hope I can give you guys a little surprise. Thank you all for this month of full crunching.

    Carlos Pinho

  6. #6
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    August 16th, 2012
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Posts
    1,314

    Re: 2,1037- sieve

    This is the number, 31376, the number of wu's still left to be done on 2,1037- sieving. This number represents the aborted ones, the left ones, etc.
    Let's point to 7-8 days to fully complete the 2,1037- sieve due to the increase of the wu's deadline from 4 days to 7 days.

    Carlos

  7. #7
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    August 16th, 2012
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Posts
    1,314

    Re: 2,1037- sieve

    It's down to 20948 wu's left (16e+16e V5).

  8. #8
    Friend of SETI.USA
    Join Date
    November 15th, 2010
    Posts
    2,452

    Re: 2,1037- sieve

    the S2m1037 are the ones Greg wants run ???

  9. #9
    Gold Member

    Join Date
    August 16th, 2012
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Posts
    1,314

    Re: 2,1037- sieve

    Quote Originally Posted by STE\/E View Post
    the S2m1037 are the ones Greg wants run ???
    Yes. You might already have a few ones in your queue. I also had a few, didn't abort them, only the S2p1047 ones.

  10. #10
    Friend of SETI.USA
    Join Date
    November 15th, 2010
    Posts
    2,452

    Re: 2,1037- sieve

    Quote Originally Posted by pinhodecarlos View Post
    Yes. You might already have a few ones in your queue. I also had a few, didn't abort them, only the S2p1047 ones.
    Yes I see some on at least 1 Box, will check them all ...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •